williambootartist.com
  • Home
  • Welcome
    • Profile >
      • CV
      • Statement
      • Method
  • Blog
  • Store
    • Commissions
  • Geometry
    • Geometry In Art
    • Geometric Abstraction
    • Geometric Abstract Artist Index
  • Finland 2018
  • Melbourne 2017 - 18
    • Melbourne 2016
  • Finland 2015
    • USA Iowa 2014 >
      • G2A Denmark 2014 >
        • G2 Melbourne 2013
        • G3 Melbourne 2012 - 13
        • G4 Seoul/Melb 2009 - 10
        • G5 Melbourne 2007
        • G6 Melbourne 2007
        • G7 Melbourne 2007
        • G8 Korea 2006
        • G9 Korea 2005
        • G10 Korea 2005
        • G11 Korea 2004
  • G12 Korea 2003
    • G13 Korea 2003
    • G14 Melbourne 2000-2
    • G15 Melbourne 2000
    • G16 Melbourne 2000-1
    • G17 Melbourne 2000
    • G18 Melbourne 2000
    • G19 Hobart 98-99
    • G20 Lismore 96-97
    • G21 Lismore 96-97
  • Stephanie Kim
  • Design
  • Drawings
  • Words
    • Essay 1
    • Essay 2
    • Essay 3
    • Essay 4
    • Essay 5
    • Essay 6
    • Essay 7
    • Essay 8
    • Other Writers >
      • OW 2
      • OW 3
      • OW4
  • Contact
  • Projects
  • News

Painting: The Serial Urge

13/8/2014

0 Comments

 
PictureUntitled 200414, Untitled 220314, Untitled 070514 - 2014 - William M Boot
If we are to look at paintings in an intelligent way then the first thing to consider is, "what are we looking at?" and second, "what is the painting(s) saying to us?" The first question deals with the form, or "mode" of presentation of the work. The second deals with the content or meaning implicit in the artists' intention for making as well as meaning arising from the elemental structure of the work whether 2 or 3D in format. To look at a work of art and simply say "i like it" or "it makes me feel good" or "it's exciting or boring" is simplistic and naive at best. It is incumbent upon the viewer to seek out in an intelligent fashion "what is going on here?" The onus is not on the artist to provide all manner of explanation about the work but on the viewer to engage further with the work and do some thinking. This does not absolve artists from responsibility to intelligently frame their work, when asked, on multiple levels. A painting will "speak" to our emotions at an aesthetic level but to fully understand the work we must get past the "clever technique" and peel back the layers of the work compositionally and conceptually.

Paintings are constructed using a visual language code and this functions in a similar fashion  to the "codes" used in speech, music, dance or film. Language requires the use of symbols and images to create shapes and patterns which when combined give birth to meaning and understanding. Meaning is implicit in the compositions created by the artist whether with sound, movement, text, images or a combination of any of these. A failure to recognise or read the "code" results in a simplistic experience of the artwork and usually at an emotional level only. Language is "complex" and demands "attention" and "effort" by the viewer to crack the code (s) and get the correct "meaning." 

There are essentially two ways in which these codes are shared. Joseph Greenberg in his "Essays In Linguistics" states, "language can be approached as a set of culturally transmitted behaviour patterns shared by a group or as a system conforming to the rules which constitute its grammar." Essentially this means, people learn and understand (make meaning) from what they have learned from their group (society) or skilled arts practitioners using the rules (grammar) of creative systems such as (sound, images, text or movement) devise objects (works of art) that conform to their own internal code. These codes must be grasped in order for the viewer/participant to receive multiple levels of meaning. Failure to engage at a deeper level renders the power of the art object impotent, unable to mediate deeper truths to the viewer.
Having provided a basic background to the essential working of language i want to introduce here the notion of "seriality" and its opposite, "asynchronicity." What is meant by the first term is, "artworks created in a "series" or "group" where the subject or central idea is developed through multiple works and conversely, in the second, artworks created as one off, "standalone" works. Serial "praxis" is not a "stylistic phenomenon" but a "methodology" where rationale is employed to tease out the deeper implications in an idea using a body of works. These works if executed skilfully form a powerful statement concerning a core idea and sub-grouping of associated ideas. 

Not all arts practitioners work in serial fashion for various reasons but i wish to demonstrate that "asynchronous" artworks usually curtail the cohesion of a lifetime body of paintings. The final judgement of an artists oeuvre  may in fact be judged as "eclectic," "indiscriminate," "conservative," or worse "substandard" and unfairly relegated to obscurity with relation to art historical "significance." No artist welcomes obscurity after a lifetime of contribution to the arts. Recognition, reward and success are sought to varying degrees by all arts practitioners. The obscure, wilful genius in the attic pumping out asynchronous "masterpieces" with no desire for recognition would be an "extremely rare" phenomenon these days with so many avenues open to artists to make their work known, although the "gifted savant" regarded by most as an anomaly, sometimes makes an appearance.
Picture32 Campbells Soup Cans - 1962 Andy Warhol
Okay, what does this "serial" methodology consist of?, you ask. Firstly, it is not "modularity," which is "the repetition of a standard unit." This means that all the pieces in a set are the same size, colour and shape etc. According to Mel Bochner, serial art occurs when a group of works are constructed that follow 3 basic rules. 

Firstly, "the derivation of the terms or the interior divisions of the work is by means of a numerical or otherwise systematically pre-determined process (permutation, progression, rotation or reversal).
 
Secondly, the order takes precedence over the execution.
 
Thirdly, the completed work is fundamentally parsimonious and systematically self-exhausting."
 
What this means is, the serial work of art is pre-planned using predominantly numerical systems to set up the interior components of the work. The individual works are usually distinct as works in themselves but are also distinctly synonymous with the group they belong to. This is different to "repetition" which is synonymous with "sameness."


PictureModular Four Panels #1 - 1969 Roy Lichtenstein
Serial methodology is concerned with the "plan" rather than the "obsession with technique" and the idea of "clever" or "genius!" This doesn't mean that the serial artist isn't interested in "technique," it simply means that "idea" or "concept" has usurped prominence in the artists' strategy for "making" or "inventing" new forms of artwork. The serial artist pursues pictorial strategies that enable a deeper coherence of a theme and a robust poetry that develops out of the multiplicity of angles afforded by the grouping of works. Quite simply, one painting is a paragraph but ten paintings comprise a book with each work playing the part of "chapter." The power of "seriality" shouldn't be underestimated and the potential for innovation and invention multiplies with the different facets that a serial group of works brings to the viewer.

PictureUntitled Painting (In 9 Parts) - 1988 - Cy Twombly
Mel Bochner titled his informative essay on this subject, "The Serial Attitude (pdf)" because he recognised that this method of working is first and foremost a "way of thinking." Many modern artists have adopted this approach to invention but we can see the precursors of serial thinking going back to the renaissance. Maybe the first modern serialist is Claude Monet who would furiously paint a number of canvases simultaneously in order to catch the changing light conditions from minute to minute. His more than 30 "Rouen Cathedrals," the "Haystacks" or "Water Lilies" (see L'Orangerie) all demonstrate beautifully the power of serial painting. Other painters of note include Thomas Eakins, Alfred Jensen, Andy Warhol, Jasper Johns, Larry Poons, Cy Twombly and Robert Rauschenberg. There are also artists working in a 3D format like Donald Judd and Sol LeWitt who created powerfully visual art using serial methodology. Maybe Edward Muybridge was the first to introduce the possibilities of the serial image using photography. His experiments with multiple, parallel strips of time-lapse images greatly influenced other artists and musicians such as Arnold Schoenberg and Milton Babbit and later John Cage and Philip Glass. If we go back a few centuries earlier we find Bach and later Beethoven using serial compositional devices to create music that is now universally acknowledged as "classic" and "timeless." Where would we be without Bach and his timeless inventions? 

Serial thinking is a big part of how i innovate and construct paintings. I am greatly inspired by artists who have invented "timeless" works of art with serial thinking strategies. There are so many creative people who employ this way of thinking that it is impossible to mention them here as the list is extensive. Seriality has proved to be an iconoclastic mode of thinking and making that has widened the fissure between traditional (archaic) and contemporary perception and indelibly changed the face of modern art.  

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    William M Boot

    An eclectic compendium of artistic and philosophical musings on ideas that have fired my imagination and inspiration over many years.

    Archives

    December 2018
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

    Art Blogs

    Abcrit

    Painters Table 

    Huffington Post Art

    Daily Art Fixx

    Paint Later

    Contemporary Art Daily

    Christopher Volpe's Art Blog

    Chris McAuliffe Art Writing

    Hyperallergic

    Joanne Mattera Art Blog

    Encaustic Art Blog Roll

    The Art Newspaper

    I Like This Art

    ​Contemporary Art Blogs
    ​

    Encaustic Art Blogs
    All Things Encaustic
    Joanne Mattera Art Blog
    Encaustic Links Page

    Art Articles

    Anish Kapoor Coats Cloud Gate In the "Darkest" Black Known to Humanity

    Jasper Johns:Monotypes 

    Robert Ryman: Double Positive

    ​Clifford Still's Radical Repetitions

    Giorgio Morandi: Peculiar Realist

    Giorgio Morandi - Metaphysician of Bologna

    ​Alberto Burri's Challenge

    I Will Not Be A Sunday Painter: Alberto Burri Makes a Picture in 1954

    Jackson Pollock - Tate Liverpool

    Painting and Reality: Art as Analogy

    Real painting - Exhibition Review

    Gerhard Richter Interview: Abstract Paintings

    Abstract Painting: Social Function

    Abstract Painting: Everything is Finished, Nothing is Dead

    Cy Twombly Drawings

    Realizing Clifford Still

    Cy Twombly Interview

    The Cult of Jeff Koons

    Modern Art Was a CIA Weapon

    Agnes Martin - Two Books - A Life

    Agnes Martin - An Existential Shudder From a Pure White Surface

    Agnes Martin - Tate Exhibition

    Agnes Martin - Interview

    The Abstract Sublime in Contemporary Art: Robert Rosenblum

    Nicholas De Stael - Needs To Be Seen

    Donald Judd and Frank Stella Interview - What You See Is What You See

    Imi Knoebel - Interview

    Imi Knoebel - Dia 2009

    Fantasies Artists Have About Success

    Damien Hirst - Plagiarist Extraordinaire - Learn the Truth

    Bridget Riley - Exhibition Review

    Vincent Longo: Interview 2016

    ​Philip Guston:Flesh and Bones and 'Thingness'

    ​
    Luc Tuymans: Interview with Jarrett Earnest

    ​Luc Tuymans: "On the Image" essay

    ​Luc Tuymans: "Le Meprise" Exhibition at David Zwirner Galleries, NYC, 2016

    ​Lloyd Rees: The Final Interview with Janet Hawley

    ​Richard Pousette-Dart:
    Exhibition Review- Pace NYC